To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [CBQ] corporate history |
From: | "gary laakso" <vasa0vasa@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:16:17 -0400 |
Delivered-to: | archives@venus.nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1301249772; bh=Uws8e0s6tHyz03e6mZV8kMmJmDtSlqnrhg1OcGfuzXg=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:X-Priority:X-Mailer:To:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=iSzPE/00Y7rP8SPzgY5AFiRNDGkeVkCUpgmcRoAu+WHvWn1pfnYKNBn86ksE0Zkz70jZN+wiIOYvidCP+BGXE4cXUYhbbSdDT/TjJwwcDJznm+C6pRUvBRdv/2qZxP5T |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=moEV0ZYWA9h5EACfi0lvRZMy5cMlPQOxlnXCaP61VwsVNExna5bCbrbyyblMu/keq0PmrGcCAHQPCDU5jXmp4zvPZi173yztqr4PNGlT91G5PT1Eh4b/Ek+MrG0abrxW; |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
You might want to review a contemporary Moody's Railroad to review its history of the involved railroads. My 1946 edition does not mention St.LK&W. gary laakso ----- Original Message ----- From: Duncan Cameron To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Sent: 3/27/2011 1:45:34 PM Subject: [CBQ] corporate history Okay, here I go again. I've got Baldwin's corporate history in one hand and Overton in the other. Overton, on page 174, mentions the purchase of the St.Louis, Keokuk and Western Railway by the Q in 1881. Baldwin makes no mention of this but shows Perkins buying it in 1888 and conveying it to a newly created Q subsidiary called the St.LK&W Railroad Company. Later it is formally leased and then purchased. Anyone have any insight to offer on this apparent discrepancy? One of the things that makes me suspicious of the 1881 date is the financial troubles that allowed the 1888 purchase. It surprised me that a Q owned company would find itself in default to its creditors. But who am I to doubt Overton? Duncan Cameron [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CBQ] corporate history, Duncan Cameron |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [CBQ] rail bridge over the Des Moines River at Keokuk, Bob |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] corporate history, Duncan Cameron |
Next by Thread: | [CBQ] Re: corporate history, Gary E. Olszewski |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |