To: | <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] corporate history |
From: | Duncan Cameron <d.cameron@sympatico.ca> |
Date: | Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:45:31 -0400 |
Delivered-to: | archives@venus.nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1301247933; bh=9Kavol6kQLJJXECF83H/swJ6dU6RlIHdPOD0WOJxtWY=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Originating-Email:Message-ID:X-Received:To:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-OriginalArrivalTime:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Sx4qP9qJ3AyEZiItEevXy/JeXBl/0esn2B86GYdU5UBeI4nqT1kISF3MMxoQDRrdVLfs185AziIy6LFf3J6JNbpVoqvNz7UCj7jnsoZP4BhPCgbm8gIiw0IfXUnAk83b |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=bB4O/8nHPIG5aEwm9lJSnzG0mUpczGtp0FiLNL0ns5ETMhJ7N3nlnQNeI26sI1Hl41Y/pCHwSyfy/x/WPTc5X1t+4TPVSLIkq2Gaa89ZNG8oUchSf0zd+/FirueU3ogP; |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Okay, here I go again. I've got Baldwin's corporate history in one hand and Overton in the other. Overton, on page 174, mentions the purchase of the St.Louis, Keokuk and Western Railway by the Q in 1881. Baldwin makes no mention of this but shows Perkins buying it in 1888 and conveying it to a newly created Q subsidiary called the St.LK&W Railroad Company. Later it is formally leased and then purchased. Anyone have any insight to offer on this apparent discrepancy? One of the things that makes me suspicious of the 1881 date is the financial troubles that allowed the 1888 purchase. It surprised me that a Q owned company would find itself in default to its creditors. But who am I to doubt Overton? Duncan Cameron [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] re: Black Nose Stripes in 1961, Stephen Levine |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [CBQ] corporate history, gary laakso |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] re: Black Nose Stripes in 1961, Norm Metcalf |
Next by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] corporate history, gary laakso |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |