| To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CBQ] Railroad operations |
| From: | Scott Walker <jscottw46@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 05 Mar 2011 10:01:05 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | archives@venus.nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1299340878; bh=jQWZwF4q3XKqHyxh4cIl93CIR3QNYOKiJzB3CRK8Z5I=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:User-Agent:To:References:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=abEaWTawE362MhfgdHhHT1aXI7WUlk2p75pwSAhTMSapDiA8zpC2X/PRpy/bIcJYWiE/zhgEwSKKoVUit6HvFqdZ8f0HpdboipCD6gW89I7WHSwmv45fYBF6hrXbd4P9 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=iTqPEk0RFtGAxcUKNeUDYFILHwMTuZ4UeKjOwWBjYjG9qb5qzP3lrw+/KhM4YnC3s0Z/ieEht8wkS9GyLfkHYs/udE0EonONl3gxDFCOS0iUIgyjgZfi7o0WEwu3mHFG; |
| In-reply-to: | <264319.30782.qm@web121615.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> |
| List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
| Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
| References: | <264319.30782.qm@web121615.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> |
| Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
Ah, John! You took all the fun away!
Scott Walker
On 3/5/2011 9:56 AM, John D. Mitchell, Jr. wrote:
>
>
> After I responded to Leo's e-mail, a few more examples came to mind.
> (snip). I read recently that the reason that the railroads employed
> non-lawyers as claim agents is that they didn't want claim agents to
> be bound by the legal code of ethics. Can you imagine, they didn't
> want them to be as ethical as lawyers! Before anybody starts, I'm a
> retired lawyer.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Railroad operations, John D. Mitchell, Jr. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CBQ] Re: Q E5 Units, Norm Metcalf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Railroad operations, John D. Mitchell, Jr. |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Railroad operations, Jpslhedgpeth |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |