BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CBQ] M/W Paint - why CB&Q switched to orange

To: <cbq@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [CBQ] M/W Paint - why CB&Q switched to orange
From: Gerald & Virginia Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:51:19 -0500
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1279638663; bh=HO5u+zDnxlvWdKjFT5lMCWtR30ECE0o0mvjUqPFw0ng=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:To:Importance:In-Reply-To:References:X-OriginalArrivalTime:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ZfbsYYIZuv3LMVzfmI4xPMeCPxFWxkUQ6n33zsxk2pTzkUsqBkHnyBuxWxvuMsBaaeKbW2XoUsmjzMoy1UiRS/bDm2uviN4fL8+eApmtgZwUpGx+GWHzccQoDfXTMUFE
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=ZOx5fXFVBTh7eMDrox+HyTnu16UwfulDwC8NXPr50nWhVAWrmbA/yNTueEeMYPmWC6D54W4dzBXyE4KcKjq/ayCqWs8WcRLbQhmZ8tIPicuA4mGVzFPBtr4+/G4a2iEc;
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <E27B7663-8A8E-4A2D-9342-D41609097DD7@surewest.net>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <8E597928-C4A1-4B92-9D44-7485C889FDDC@surewest.net>,<196B6154D574469A87ECD959A71E81EE@STUDY>,<8CCF519359DCAD6-2980-25442@webmail-d011.sysops.aol.com>,<A24BDBE9072C4579BE458EC1E8E9FD0A@STUDY>,<E27B7663-8A8E-4A2D-9342-D41609097DD7@surewest.net>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Although I have not seen a rationale for going to orange MoW paint in 
Burlington documents, under Ralph Budd, there was a major push to make the 
Burlington a VERY safe RR (which ultimately resulted with the Q winning the 
Harriman Safety Award* a few times).  Other RR's that converted to orange after 
WWII were B&LE, P&PU & CGW; AT&SF went to silver. Not coincidentally they were 
also Harriman recipients. Those of you in other parts of USA may know of RR's 
in your area that made the change post-WWII.


For a variety of reasons, in post-War America 'safety' became a more important 
factor in consumer products, industry etc and one of the "findings" was that 
certain colors denoted Safety or made an object more visible and safer.  The 
National Safety Council became a major force (remember OSHA did not come around 
til 1970 and in any case, initially did NOT cover RR's) & FRA started to look 
at personal safety rather than just rolling stock, locos & track conditions.  
Thus "Safety orange" became popular thruout industry and many RR's that 
heretofore painted their MoW equipment "boxcar" or "tuscan" red (common to 
their frt car fleet & cheap) went to orange or silver.  Per AAR stats, a common 
cause of injury to MoW employees was when occupying their bunks, etc, they 
would be 'struck' by cars being switched into sidings or handled roughly.  
Since nearly all frt cars in the 40's/50's were either boxcar red or black 
(tank cars), painting MoW equipment orange put them in the class of reefers 
which also were orange/yellow & always got special handling.  Also bright 
orange or silver reflected sunlight, a plus for MoW bunks that were not 
air-conditioned. (you'll note old wood & early steel passenger cars converted 
to MoW service & painted orange, got silver roofs)

The Q like most RR's req'd MoW equip to be handled either directly behind the 
motive power or next to the waycar; being orange it was easier to see what was 
MoW and what was frt (MoW equipment mostly being ex-frt cars made them similar 
in appearance at a glance when all were painted the same boxcar red)

 

*The Harriman Award was created by & partially funded by the Averill Harriman 
family as a result of the many deaths in the RR industry.  Into the 1970's, 
RRing was one of the 10 most hazardous industries in America and "in the day" 
more RR'ers died in the line of duty than did coal miners.  Today RR'ing is a 
relatively safe occupation largely due to a major commitment by the RR's and 
the Brotherhoods.  Indeed RR'ing was so dangerous a 100 yrs ago  that the 1st 
Industrial Safety Dept was created not by a steel company or mining corporation 
but by a RR (C&NW) in 1901.  The oft-quoted "Safety First" came from the RR 
industry as did a wealth of Safety promotions via the AAR, Brotherhoods, 
individual RR's etc.  To win the Harriman was a real coup and was touted in 
passenger promotions in terms of passenger safety.  If you look at old CB&Q 
TT's, you will see remarks relating to safety, esp. when they converted to 
steel cars, electric light (vs Pinsch gas), steam heat vs stoves, ATC, etc.  
The Burlington proudly displayed copies of the Harriman awards not only in 
company shops, but in some depots, etc.  The old multi-colored certificates 
show up at some RR shows and are very displayable.

 

Those of you with collections of old RR-issued accident reports will note into 
the 30's the ultimate cause in cases on personal injury was "want of caution"; 
i.e. the RR'er was not being careful.  After WWII you start see other causes, 
the hazard was not marked, employee not trained properly, hope not filled, etc. 
 Safety Depts went from being reactive & 'rules' driven  to pro-active & 
training.

 

Today's BNSF (always remembering where the 'first' name of BNSF comes from!) 
was among the very first major employers to mandate 'stretching' exercises for 
Engineering emps @ start of shift - the 'time on the clock' to do so is paid 
for by BNSF but the reduction in work comp costs more than repays the lost 
productivity time.

 

Gerald




 

   



  
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest ? Unsubscribe ? Terms of Use


. 


                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>