[CBQ] Re: signalling

["v16srtop" <markbristow251@btinternet.com>]

Leo,

Thanks for your reply - that's useful.

It would seem then, that provision of motor-worked switches and ground signals 
was probably tailored to the level of traffic - quite sensible.

In my example I have a lightly used interchange track and team track, the 
switches of which sit just beyond the signals protecting the junction and 
crossing. From your comments I think hand throws without dwarfs would be 
appropriate.

In such cases of hand throws and no dwarfs being provided, what would crews do 
when they showed up to switch the track? I'm guessing they had a conversation 
with the tower Operator who authorised them to do their work, passing any 
signals at danger if needed?

Regards,

Mark

P.S. If I sketched out my arrangement on a piece of paper and scanned it, would 
you mind casting your eye over it to see how you think Q crews might have 
worked the connections?





------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/