To: | cbq@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] Transfer moves |
From: | qutlx1@aol.com |
Date: | Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:38:10 EST |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1258339097; bh=DmbhZc9oRLLtsUZYQCCOFZQI7//Aya2H7xoEsSM1Cfo=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:To:X-Mailer:X-Spam-Flag:X-AOL-SENDER:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=sFIDicWFsGc+Ffyte07F0/MshuWs9g/dMkZiqSS6A1Ejn22wCUfYRH+7uvmgad7SrprzMyFLj9MIRReryJy9lS5LCIwwQj71FDTldS8l6TwSl+lgxjTJ2AD+rzArfWwH |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=aOrVYVi7ymiEl7AldJFMLSiHhKcOVK0lMW2qq8+D15LfKqHLz4QQjXZMSx5/30UDb/pP0CUpzq8MtsPijPkv09Xa6V3VB0sBLUDHsal0ivEegeR140dEETnBZlPu61G+; |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Russ is correct. It was routine outside or inside yard limits as we often made moves w/o a w/c. It was a matter of convenience for the crew and room in the engine cab. If in doubt check the consolidated code rules. There's no requirement for a w/c .I remember running engine lite from Cat to Somonauk and not abiding by the special instruction speed limit for a lite engine on the mainline. Some on this list still recall the Sunday ritual of a lite engine leaving Eola headed to Zearing via Ottawa and La Salle to do nothing but trade engines at each town so they could come back with one about due for the 30 day inspection. On the other hand we often dragged the w/c around everywhere when others wondered why we did it. Geez today the standard is no w/c or rear crew. In fact reading the trade pubs(Railway Age and Progressive Railroading one has to wonder if any crews will exist in a few years. Leo Phillipp [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CBQ] Frt cars moving on their own, qutlx1 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CBQ] Railroad Freight Cars Moving on Their Own, Bob Weber |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] Frt cars moving on their own, qutlx1 |
Next by Thread: | [CBQ] Cars moving on their own, CY |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |