BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Re: Misc historic CB&Q facts

To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: Misc historic CB&Q facts
From: "Steven Holding" <s.holding@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 22:25:43 -0600
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <A9288DCA-4F4E-11D8-B808-000A959EED28@earthlink.net> <00cd01c3e395$3ab9e740$0f05460a@mongolia2>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Yeah Right
It now takes manned helpers for the trains to go up South Albia Hill
And how many crews Creston to Ottumwa
sjh
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@earthlink.net>
To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: Misc historic CB&Q facts


> Bill,
>
> Would be quite obvious that GTM's would be way up from
> 1925 but actual train miles would probably be lower today.
>
> In that era there were many lines where all trains operated
> would be very small by today's standards. The social and
> economic climates were different.
>
> Right now takes two locomotives to move a 19,000 ton coal
> train from Alliance to Galesburg. In 1925 terms that tonnage
> would have required many more trains and locomotive changes
> at various points.
>
> Yes, the technology has really expanded.
>
> Russ
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: William Barber
>   To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Sunday, 25 January, 2004 09:53
>   Subject: [CBQ] Re: Misc historic CB&Q facts
>
>
>   Gerald,
>
>   One really interesting number (at least to me) in your information from
>   the 1925 OER is the total number of locomotives in service nation wide.
>   At that time, your information shows 76, 671 locomotives, undoubtedly
>   most were steam. After complete dieselization, the total diesel fleet
>   was about 25,000 units. Today, that number is less than 20,000 and yet,
>   I believe gross ton miles today, exceed the GTM at that time.
>   Interesting efficiency improvement and probably one reason why RRs are
>   still viable. Thanks for the information. Sure shows how prominent the
>   Q was in the U.S. rail picture. No wonder, GN and NP hung onto the
>   stock.
>
>   Bill Barber
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>  CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>



 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/8ZCslB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>