To: | BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [BRHSlist] Re: "Herewith enclosed please find . . . " |
From: | LaVerne Andreessen <LWAndreessen@f...> |
Date: | Mon, 23 Dec 2002 22:53:58 -0600 |
References: | <20021224044640.74631.qmail@w...> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3 |
John D. Mitchell, Jr. wrote: LaVerne The practice of law is very hidebound too. After all, we believe that you should decide each case the same way as the last case! But with the respect to the railroad, their ways worked and that is important. John Well, I guess we can say they did. However, didn't the rails employ around 2,000,000 million people ca. 1950 compared to what, a quarter of a million today? Perhaps not all of their ways worked? LWA |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [BRHSlist] Re: "Herewith enclosed please find . . . ", Don Ross |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Spelling of Employe(e)s, William Barber |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [BRHSlist] Re: "Herewith enclosed please find . . . ", John D. Mitchell, Jr. |
Next by Thread: | Re: [BRHSlist] Re: "Herewith enclosed please find . . . ", Don Ross |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |