BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] Chicago, Burlington and Northern

To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Chicago, Burlington and Northern
From: Mike Spoor <CBQRR@j...>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 09:44:29 -0600
Cc: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
Ken: Charlie, Ken and Russ have already put in excellent responses. I
would like to add that originally the CB&N connected with the Chicago &
Iowa (C&I) at Oregon, IL . I have interviewed many of the old timers who
constantly referred to one of the tracks at Oregon as the "CB&N track"
which is where cars were spotted to be picked up by the CB&N. This
practice started in 1886. When I started interviewing retired employees
in the mid 1980s, they all remember calling that track the "CB&N" track,
even though both lines had been acquired and merged into the CB&Q in
1899!

Mike Spoor 

On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:44:00 -0000 "Ken Ingram" <jingram05@h...>
writes:
>Hello! My name is Ken Ingram. I have recently come into the 
>possesion of December 1890 Chicago, Burlington and Northern Railroad 
>time tables/map, and I have a few questions:
>
>While there is heavy empahsis on St. Paul to Chicago and St. Louis, 
>the map depicts the entire Burlington system (in fact, the entire 
>U.S.). I had thought the CB&N was bought by the CB&Q in 1899. Was 
>the CB&N owned by CB&Q at this time 1890? My guess is yes.
>
>Is there a source on-line for a few paragraphs about the history of 
>the CB&N, and/or photos of the CB&N?
>
>Curious that the CB&N refers to itself in these time tables as "THe 
>Burlington". I have a modest collection of time tables and ephemera 
>for various select railroads. The CB&Q and it's predecessor roads 
>are very interesting to me personally. These CB&N RR time tables and 
>
>map from 1890 are as nice as any I've come across.
>
>Thanks,
>Ken Ingram 
>
>
> 
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>