BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] Athearn models

To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Athearn models
From: "Tom Barrett" <barrett@g...>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 23:37:51 -0600
References: <fd.1109769f.2953ccc9@a...>
Right on I am with you all the way on your theory's, its like having
a old classic car, if its that perfect I would be afraid to drive it. Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: <Mbsoren1@a...>
To: <brhslist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 5:22 PM
Subject: [BRHSlist] Athearn models


> There seems to be a lot of nit-picking going on. I, and I know others who
> model and use Athearn, tend to use something I learned at the NMRA 99
> convention. It was called the rule of 4 feet: If it looks good on the
> layout when viewed no closer than 4 feet then it is OK. Along with that
is a
> 2 feet rule: If it is moving on the layout and looks good from a distance
of
> 2 feet, then it is OK. If total modeling perfection is desired, then the
> model should be displayed and not run!
> I expect this to stir up a firestorm but give it some good thought.
> Bob S.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Athearn models, Mbsoren1
    • Re: [BRHSlist] Athearn models, Tom Barrett <=