BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] Twins, was Re: Challenger Zephyrs & 05's

To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Twins, was Re: Challenger Zephyrs & 05's
From: "M. Thayer" <zephyr@k...>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 20:11:55 -0500
References: <9bl7su+hsmk@e...>
Reply-to: "M. Thayer" <mthayer@k...>
----- Original Message -----
From: <zephyrus@r...>
To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 6:27 PM
Subject: [BRHSlist] Twins, was Re: Challenger Zephyrs & 05's


> --- In BRHSlist@y..., "M. Thayer" <zephyr@k...> wrote:
> > Randy's assignments of 100 and 525 are correct, but only after the
> trains
>
> I hope so, Marshall. Your RMC article series is one of my main
> references! :-)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Randy
>
<blush> -

That wasn't what I meant . . . I am concerned if Challenger is marketing
their 4-car 9901/9902 as Twin Zephyr assignments. It just didn't happen.

(I did offer to advise them & got a "yeah yeah sure sure")

Oh, well - Caveat Emptor!

Marshall


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>