BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] KATO SD40, CB&Q or C&S?

To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] KATO SD40, CB&Q or C&S?
From: "Robert H Whitlatch" <fwd850@c...>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:28:27 -0600
References: <a.96db058.27cddbb4@a...>
Reply-to: "Robert H Whitlatch" <fwd850@c...>
Tim - The biggest visable failing of the Kato SD40 as a C&S unit is the
truck sideframes. The C&S units had the earlier SD truck like is on a SD7
or SD9. Lifelike sells the truck sideframes for their SD7/9 as a seperate
item. They only require minimum alteration of the mounting stud to fit the
Kato truck frame. Makes a world of difference in the appearance of the
engine and it really becomes a C&S.
----- Original Message -----
From: <tgcostello@a...>
To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:42 PM
Subject: [BRHSlist] KATO SD40, CB&Q or C&S?


> Fellow Q'listers:
>
> So far, we have established that:
> the Q did not operate any SD40s
> the C&S did
> Kato identified their model as a Burlington SD40, fooling all the
> non-devotees
>
> Well, I've got one of those "mis-labeled" SD40s in my closet and someday
soon
> it's going to see the light of day. What I would like to know is, what
> markings on these units distinguished them as C&S power?
>
> My photographic reference is pretty lean. A photo of C&S 883 on page 40
of
> CTC Board 11/95 doesn't show any C&S ID above the numberboard. Just what
> additional lettering is warranted to accurately model these handsome
units?
>
> thanks
> Tim Costello
> Irvine, CA
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>