To: | <BRHSlist@egroups.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [BRHSlist] Short term load rating-F Units on the point |
From: | Ed DeRouin <PIXELS@A...> |
Date: | Thu, 25 Jan 2001 08:33:28 -0600 |
In-reply-to: | <60.afaebf5.27a0edfe@a...> |
User-agent: | Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 |
> Another factor, believe it or not, was that even in the early 70's, some EL F > units still did not have MU setups for the front of the A units. Tim: That might explain, if EL was following the practice I mentioned in the previous post, why the SD 45 was not leading the F unit. I am certain that it happened, and suspect an engineer worthy of the craft took the weaker sister into consideration. But, things do happen out there and sometimes one needs to get over the road. Ed |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | E Unit Safety Appliances, Ed DeRouin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [BRHSlist] The Murger, Wes Leatherock |
Previous by Thread: | Short term load rating-F Units on the point, tgcostello |
Next by Thread: | CB&Q in Sidney, Nebraska, ca. 1957, David |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |