BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] Bulletin Philosophy

To: BRHSlist@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Bulletin Philosophy
From: Tom Smith <sd70mac@h...>
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 13:44:06 -0600
References: <3.0.5.32.20001104093021.007f0370@m...>
First of all, I still haven't seen my copy of this Bulletin!

I think we are really lucky to have such a first rate publication and
thank the dedicated volunteers that put it together. Every topic doesn't
excite me, but I read them all and always learn something. I think much
would be lost if the Bulletin were more like a magazine, with more
subjects but less detail. It's the depth of detail that draws me into
each issue.
As far as modeling orientation, maybe that's a subject for data sheets
or some other form of publication. Maybe even another organization. How
can a historical society be too historical?
Are these naysayers miffed because they have submitted Bulletin drafts
that were rejected? I would guess not.

Tom Smith


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>