Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+HO\s+models\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+HO\s+models\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "baton580" <rplaehn@c...>; Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 08:35:59 -0600; cbq168a@i... They are Standard core exceptions of the the Water they NCL. I Budds so all the exceptions. I would really like to find an accurate answer to that statement. I feel that your comment tha; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00046.html (10,753 bytes)
2. Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "thommack" <mack@c...>; Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 10:02:45 -0600; I am both excited and disappointed at the Broadway Limited news. It sounds like it will be a great model, but the small number boards and black stripes are disappointing (since P2K already did the sm; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00048.html (10,120 bytes)
3. Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "thommack" <mack@c...>; Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 12:28:17 -0600; Since I model late 60's, I can't see myself buying the black nose stripe, small numberboard E7's, but definitely count me in on later releases, especially red w/ large numberboards!! Tom versions sec; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00060.html (15,662 bytes)
4. Re: New HO models (score: 1): Author: "thommack <mack@c...>" <mack@c...>; Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 16:04:32 -0600; I always thought unnumbered units would be a great idea, but have changed my mind lately. I agree that the E's would be very easy to renumber. Even the P2K locomotives are very easy to renumber. I ha; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00085.html (11,797 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]