Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Various\s+Q\s+questions\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Various\s+Q\s+questions\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Various Q questions... (score: 1): Author: <kohlj@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:48:56 -0400; I've saved up a few to post at the same time... :) Reading about the early history of the Q and early railroads, it's a bit confusing to understand exactly what was going on. It seems that some railr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00040.html (10,267 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Various Q questions... (score: 1): Author: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 11:46:51 +1200; Jan My understanding is that using a separate company for the construction separated the parent company from legal and financial liability if the project turned pear shaped. I think it was also a dev; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-08/msg00046.html (11,403 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]