BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Various Q questions...

To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Various Q questions...
From: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 11:46:51 +1200
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=ThFp2cZi0/2Fk/2smiG7Pi9TumYNP6KMFRUOWPVZYFP0fsiFhgtnc6EJhXZ9o2m+b4XPnfTlYoDY6dgc/FFijDSnolGF45dBQ1DGHBGCdbVycn9LCYIh1hB8Lpij8dcT;
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <20050805144856.LYJA3347.ibm60aec.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Jan

My understanding is that using a separate company for the construction 
separated the parent company from legal and financial liability if the 
project turned pear shaped.  I think it was also a device to avoid 
disclosing the interest that the CB&Q (or the other major players who used 
this method) had in the early planning stages, in order to get a jump on the 
opposition.

Rupert Gamlen
Auckland N.Z.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <kohlj@bellsouth.net>
To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 2:48 AM
Subject: [CBQ] Various Q questions...


> Reading about the early history of the Q and early railroads, it's a bit 
> confusing to understand exactly what was going on.  It seems that some 
> railroads were started to purposefully be pulled back into the CB&Q at a 
> later time, while other ones were naturally absorbed.  Can someone explain 
> the laws or situation that created this type of atmosphere?
>
> I know the roster for the CB&Q in 1953 shows no steam left on the 
> K-line...everything has already been dieselized there.  Does anyone have 
> an earlier roster or can tell me what the last steam on the K-line was?
>
> SD9s seem to have a weird fuel tank arrangement.  The tank appears to 
> actually be 2 smaller tanks, sometimes you see one, (at the rear), other 
> times both.  Can someone comment on this option with the SD9 and why you 
> see different tank configurations?
>
> I think that's it for now.  Had another one but it escapes me at the 
> moment.  Got quite a few new updates at Castle Graphics if you've not 
> checked it out lately, so enjoy!
>
> Cheers!
>
> Jan Kohl
> Castle Graphics
> www.castlegraphics.com
> 




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12h94g8hj/M=362343.6886682.7839641.1493532/D=groups/S=1706043004:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1123292827/A=2894352/R=0/SIG=11fdoufgv/*http://www.globalgiving.com/cb/cidi/tsun.html";>Help
 tsunami villages rebuild at GlobalGiving. The real work starts now</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>