Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+VO1000\s+disposition\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+VO1000\s+disposition\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] VO1000 disposition question (score: 1): Author: "andrethebusman99@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 17 Nov 2017 03:19:10 +0000; Can anybody shed additional light on what CB&Q Baldwins were traded in to GE and which to EMD? EMD dats shows 8 traded for SW1200's 9281-9288 in 1965, 12 for SW1000's 9310-9321 in 1966. 11 more went; /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-11/msg00022.html (12,580 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] VO1000 disposition question (score: 1): Author: "Bill Hirt whirt@fastmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 08:48:22 -0600; Andre, The only light I have shed on this is based on the book Diesel Locomotive Rosters reprinted from Railroad Magazine. The rosters in this book are known to have errors. However for what is worth; /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-11/msg00027.html (14,859 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] VO1000 disposition question (score: 1): Author: "andrethebusman99@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 18 Nov 2017 15:32:14 +0000; I have the book in question, and actually also the Railroad Magazine that had same roster in it. It raises many questions, as it shows totally different dispositions for these than the Extra 2200 Sou; /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-11/msg00028.html (12,651 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]