- 1. [CBQ] U28/30B (score: 1)
- Author: "Rupert and Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:51:04 +1200
- Listers There's an error in the Diesel Roster on the BRHS site that have just been found. 150-154 were shown in error as U30C's but should be U30B's. My apologies for this. Also, in passing, 140-9 sh
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-06/msg00050.html (9,008 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] U28/30B (score: 1)
- Author: "East Pass" <EastPass@19main.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 17:37:07 -0500
- Rupert, Yes, the model plates were purely cosmetic. There were other roads that got units with the plates, C&O GP9's come to mind. CB&Q seems to be the only road that fell in head over heels on the c
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-06/msg00057.html (10,364 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] U28/30B (score: 1)
- Author: amtrak347@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 01:56:19 EDT
- Hi Russ - Not to be contrary (again) but I feel the locomotive model designation plates did serve a purpose to those who ran them. Remember the Q restricted various tracks by "class" of locomotive, g
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-06/msg00061.html (10,287 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] U28/30B (score: 1)
- Author: "BRAD SLANEY" <bradslaney@wizard.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 07:08:02 -0700
- Thank Ernie Potarf for the GEs. Hi Russ - Not to be contrary (again) but I feel the locomotive model designation plates did serve a purpose to those who ran them. Remember the Q restricted various tr
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-06/msg00063.html (11,506 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CBQ] U28/30B (score: 1)
- Author: amtrak347@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 14:33:51 EDT
- Brad - I gave him "full credit" a while back on this list during a discussion of all the "virtues" of a GE. I had heard he owned a lot of GE stock at that time. I think the big selling point of a U-2
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-06/msg00064.html (8,673 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu