Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Shortened\s+Ladders\s+and\s+removed\s+roof\s+walks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Shortened\s+Ladders\s+and\s+removed\s+roof\s+walks\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Shortened Ladders and removed roof walks (score: 1): Author: qutlx1@aol.com; Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:31:39 EST; As in all things mechanical on RR cars it is the AAR that sets the rules as to changes in standards,not the individual RRs. If my memory is correct it was either 1967 or 1969 that the AAR committee o; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-11/msg00122.html (10,082 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] Shortened Ladders and removed roof walks (score: 1): Author: Gerald & Virginia Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:36:29 -0600; I di not recall actual date either (have a copy of the AAR bulletin somewhere) but it was NOT mandatory to remove them per se. It stated that RR's must maintain roofwalks (aka running boards) or remo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-11/msg00125.html (11,523 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Shortened Ladders and removed roof walks (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:47:09 -0500; Speaking of shortened ladders and removed roof walks and over the tops. I remember the first time I had to go over the top while the train was in motion... It was the first summer I worked as a brake; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-11/msg00142.html (12,787 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]