Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Semiphore\s+signals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Semiphore\s+signals\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Semiphore signals (score: 1): Author: Duncan Cameron <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 12:35:37 -0500; I saw Dave's commercial post about the Q connection semaphores and the recent discussion about the one in Montgomery. Pictures of the Keokuk Union Depot show that at one time there was a semaphore th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00085.html (11,105 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Semiphore signals (score: 1): Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 20:52:06 -0800 (PST); Some notes in the timetable call for every train to get clearance at some depots. If there was no longer an operator it would have been taken down as depots got consolidated. A change in operating pr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00094.html (11,710 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Semiphore signals (score: 1): Author: Duncan Cameron <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 07:37:02 -0500; Steve, thanks for the info. I believe that trains on the K-line in the sixties had to get clearance at Keokuk. That would explain it. I'll have to check the photos/timetables to pin down when the cha; /archives/BRHSLIST/2011-03/msg00095.html (12,387 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]