Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Walthers\s+PS\-2\s+hoppers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Walthers\s+PS\-2\s+hoppers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] Re: Walthers PS-2 hoppers (score: 1): Author: Ben de Vries <ben1.vries@planet.nl>; Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:51:31 +0100; Hi Tom, I did not mention the height difference because that's only slightly more than 1 mm (1,167816 mm to be exact) and hard to see. Moreover we still do not know how the Athearn car will scale dow; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-12/msg00030.html (12,082 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Re: Walthers PS-2 hoppers (score: 1): Author: "Tom Mack" <thommack@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:35:59 -0600; Yes, but that extra 1mm also includes a few rivets that might be noticable.:-) Tom more not Athearn -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--> Put more honey in your pocket. (money matters made easy). http://us; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-12/msg00032.html (10,020 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Re: Walthers PS-2 hoppers (score: 1): Author: "thommack" <thommack@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:58:05 -0600; I'm just going to wait for the Athearn cars to come out for CB&Q. Also, I didn't think that the Walthers cars were correct for the HC-3 cars since the HC-3 was 4-inches taller and 6-inches wider than; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-11/msg00235.html (11,322 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]