Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Twin\s+Cities\s+line\:\s+power\s+pool\s+w\/GN\s+or\s+NP\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Twin\s+Cities\s+line\:\s+power\s+pool\s+w\/GN\s+or\s+NP\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Twin Cities line: power pool w/GN or NP? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Mack" <thommack@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 21:33:03 -0600; Fred: There are three files posted in the "Files" section you probably want to check out (you can also download these to your own computer). First, in regard to power pooling arrangements, check out; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-06/msg00018.html (13,885 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Re: Twin Cities line: power pool w/GN or NP? (score: 1): Author: Frederick Ripley <fjr@mchsi.com>; Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:38:52 -0500; There is little evidence of GN equipment showing up on Q trains out of the Twin Cities prior to the merger that I have found, except for a pool arrangement between 1959 and 1963 on one train. The pic; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-06/msg00020.html (11,210 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] Re: Twin Cities line: power pool w/GN or NP? (score: 1): Author: "BRAD SLANEY" <bradslaney@viawestdu.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:54:34 -0700; A 1952 LaCrosse Division ETT shows six daily passenger trains between Savanna and St Paul each way and a total of three freights each way. BRAD Fred: There are three files posted in the "Files" secti; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-06/msg00022.html (14,374 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Re: Twin Cities line: power pool w/GN or NP? (score: 1): Author: Deke Reiter <deke8706@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 20:37:50 -0700 (PDT); merger. The Savanna-TC line had an NYC and then PC power pool until around 68 or 69, and then because of PC going down hill, the Q terminated that agreement and started operations with the Erie Lack; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-06/msg00028.html (11,539 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]