- 1. [CBQ] Re: Trains orders to "C&M" (score: 1)
- Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 10:19:34 -0600
- Re: Trains orders to "C&M" petehedgpeth Wed Jan 8, 2014 7:48 pm (PST) . Posted by: Pete, I am sure you are aware that the Q always referred to diesels as motors right up through the early BN days, no
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00040.html (15,552 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] Re: Trains orders to "C&M" (score: 1)
- Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 15:14:44 -0500 (EST)
- Re: Trains orders to "C&M" petehedgpeth Wed Jan 8, 2014 7:48 pm (PST) . Posted by: Bill et al Two things I'm sure of...sometimes train orders referred to an "engine" as a "motor"....other times an "e
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00042.html (18,084 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Re: Trains orders to "C&M" (score: 1)
- Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:47:38 -0800 (PST)
- Re: Trains orders to "C&M" petehedgpeth Wed Jan 8, 2014 7:48 pm (PST) . Posted by: Bill et al Two things I'm sure of...sometimes train orders referred to an "engine" as a "motor"....other times an "
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00043.html (20,451 bytes)
- 4. RE: [CBQ] Re: Trains orders to "C&M" (score: 1)
- Author: robert <trainbooks@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 06:02:36 -0600
- Re: Trains orders to "C&M" petehedgpeth Wed Jan 8, 2014 7:48 pm (PST) . Posted by: From a "Frisco point of view", we had one conductor who referred to the engineer as "the motorman", and they really
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00188.html (15,695 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu