Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Palace\s+Stock\s+cars\.\.\.\.old\s+railroad\s+terminology\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: "mdeckergwtcnet" <mdecker@gwtc.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:55:01 -0600
I still use "account", as in: I didn't see anything, account I was down in the nose". I really love "See no failure to comply" :>) Mike -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go t
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00111.html (12,419 bytes)

2. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:21:02 -0800 (PST)
__._,_.___ Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use Unsubscr
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00112.html (14,269 bytes)

3. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:30:16 -0500 (EST)
Mike et al..."Down in the nose" replaced "Puttin in a fire" when diesels replaced steam..I was never involved in any kind of "incident" where a fireman was involved when he was not..."back in the eng
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00115.html (15,428 bytes)

4. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:32:12 -0500 (EST)
How about..."getting the DOPE" on something??? Pete How about things were "abolished"? It was never just ended or discontinued. I always remember a time when a special agent arrested a trespasser and
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00116.html (15,684 bytes)

5. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: archie hayden <klinerarch@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:31:22 -0600
__._,_.___ Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use Unsubscr
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00118.html (16,596 bytes)

6. [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: "mdeckergwtcnet" <mdecker@gwtc.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:55:01 -0600
Pete..... I still use "I was down on the deck puttin' in a fire" once in a while :>) Of course, nobody knows what it means LOL When the BN gave Bob Richardson the mechanical records out of the C&S ro
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00121.html (15,866 bytes)

7. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:51:25 -0800 (PST)
The thing about it, it sometimes was truthful. On a hand fired engine, firing was almost a full time task. Besides shoveling coal, you had to watch the water glass. I know the hogger was susposed to
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00122.html (17,324 bytes)

8. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:13:03 -0500 (EST)
Mike et al...I love to do that...throw out old terminogy to see what happens...My wife always said.."Why do you do that stuff nobody understands it and they think you're weird... My reply..."That's t
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00124.html (17,573 bytes)

9. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: Noel Crawford <georgecrawfordsr@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:28:11 -0500
Pete,   I agree that it is nice to be old. Second childhood. Can do things you normally wouldn't do in your earlier years and use the excuse "gee, I didn't know I wasn't supposed to do that" Kinda li
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00125.html (21,844 bytes)

10. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 18:32:04 -0800 (PST)
They don't THINK I'm weird. They KNOW I'm weird and proud of it. Any way, I know what I mean when I say "I sent it 'by wire' and 'when practicable' ". I get upset when some young person says "at the
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00126.html (18,832 bytes)

11. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:51:44 -0500 (EST)
Practicable is almost an essential word to use in railroad correspondence. Another "weird" explanation is that a single track is not "train tracks"...It takes 4 rails to have " tracks" I've got some
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00127.html (20,524 bytes)

12. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:52:50 -0500 (EST)
Mike...LET'S HAVE THOSE STORIES. Pete Pete..... I still use "I was down on the deck puttin' in a fire" once in a while :>) Of course, nobody knows what it means LOL When the BN gave Bob Richardson th
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00128.html (15,945 bytes)

13. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:47:02 -0800 (PST)
Another one was the abbrevation "Messers." for plural of "Mr." That hung around for way to long. -- On Sun, 12/16/12, Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com <Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com> wrote: From: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com <Jp
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00129.html (21,660 bytes)

14. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:23:32 -0500 (EST)
Keep 'em coming John....I may yet have enough to write some kind of "dissertation" on this matter...Phil W...help me out here too. When my round tuit gets here I'll post a list and solict comments an
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00132.html (23,006 bytes)

15. [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: "mdeckergwtcnet" <mdecker@gwtc.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:55:02 -0600
Ok, here's one.... First off, I do know that being "down on the deck" was a legitimate reason for not seeing anything, I was down behind the boiler enough when I was the one-man crew on the R&GN Ry.
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00134.html (14,117 bytes)

16. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: Lawrence Brigham <larry5925@embarqmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:09:10 -0500
To Pete Here is one for you. Larry B larry5925()embarqmail.com On 12/17/12 12:23 PM, "Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com" <Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com> wrote: Keep 'em coming John....I may yet have enough to write some k
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00136.html (23,987 bytes)

17. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:34:32 -0500 (EST)
Thanks Larry..you're causing me to run out of excuses.....The recent "project" is among several I've been going to.."get to this next winter"...well several WINTERS have gone by since then...well. "m
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00138.html (21,988 bytes)

18. Re: [CBQ] Re: Palace Stock cars....old railroad terminology (score: 1)
Author: Lawrence Brigham <larry5925@embarqmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:40:06 -0500
Larry B larry5925()embarqmail.com On 12/17/12 2:34 PM, "Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com" <Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com> wrote: Thanks Larry..you're causing me to run out of excuses.....The recent "project" is among se
/archives/BRHSLIST/2012-12/msg00139.html (24,966 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu