Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Mixed\s+trains\s+on\s+the\s+Q\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Mixed\s+trains\s+on\s+the\s+Q\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Mixed trains on the Q (score: 1): Author: "bigbearoak" <jonathanharris@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:38:46 -0600; Until I read these postings, I hadn't realized to what extent the character of the Burlington was expressed in its mixed trains - much as it was in the distinctive qualities of its steam engines or p; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00155.html (17,650 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Re: Mixed trains on the Q (score: 1): Author: "Duncan Cameron" <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>; Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:34:46 -0400; Jonathan, Very well done. Brief and very helpful to a modeller. The train I'm modelling on the old Keokuk and Western in 1962-63 will be pulled by an NW2, includes a variety of freight equipment and; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00243.html (19,464 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Re: Mixed trains on the Q (score: 1): Author: "Archie" <kliner@mywdo.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:13:56 -0500; Duncan, I happen to have a small bit of remembrance of the local that ran on the old K&W. Sometime in 1963 I believe because the student brakeman on the gravel train was Raymond Witthouse who happene; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00244.html (20,210 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Re: Mixed trains on the Q (score: 1): Author: "Duncan Cameron" <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>; Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:03:02 -0400; Archie, thanks for the details on the crash. I knew it had happened and that 63 was the end of the combine's life, but didn't know all the details. Great to know. Duncan Duncan, I happen to have a sm; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00246.html (21,065 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Re: Mixed trains on the Q (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:01:04 -0500; JonathanAn excellent treatsie... ....but I would differ with you on one fine point..... The Q, unlike other roads, really didn't build any cars new for Branchline service. For example, the "shorty" s; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00248.html (21,115 bytes)
6. [CBQ] Re: Mixed trains on the Q (score: 1): Author: "bigbearoak" <jonathanharris@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:09:06 -0600; Charlie (and list) - Thanks for the correction/clarification. You're right, of course, both with respect to the shorty combines and shorty baggage-RPOs (i.e., the ones NKP brought out a few years ago; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00256.html (24,012 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Re: Mixed trains on the Q (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:02:53 -0500; There is a persistent concept on the Burlington that I think is somewhat unfair. That it was (the word everyone seems to try to avoid) cheap. While it is true that the railroad was certainly consciou; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00257.html (26,594 bytes)
8. [CBQ] Re: Mixed trains on the Q (score: 1): Author: "bigbearoak" <jonathanharris@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:10:10 -0600; Yes, that's exactly the right distinction. I always admired the fact that this railroad which was a pioneer in both experimenting with and adopting internal combustion and diesel power was also the l; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00258.html (26,847 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Re: Mixed trains on the Q (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:41:50 -0500; Bob As a Bohemian who has straightened his share of nails and other "thrifty" practices, I will bow to your description of the spending habits of the CB&Q..... but it is a shame that the C&NW was cal; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-03/msg00259.html (10,284 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]