Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Early\s+CB\&Q\s+engine\s+lettering\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Early\s+CB\&Q\s+engine\s+lettering\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] Re: Early CB&Q engine lettering (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:05:28 -0600; I take this recent interest in Q Lettering to once again plea for anyone that has a CB&Q, C&S or FW&D Railroad Roman Stencil Drawing for the alpha or numeric characters for ANYTHING (locomotives, fre; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-11/msg00004.html (10,185 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Re: Early CB&Q engine lettering (score: 1): Author: jonathanharris@earthlink.net; Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:14:43 -0600; Thank you very much for this information, Pat. I'm not sure it necessarily follows that all these changes were system-wide, although you may well be right. The 1928 scheme I'd agree almost certainly; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-10/msg00144.html (13,232 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Re: Early CB&Q engine lettering (score: 1): Author: "homanfamily" <homanfamily@fuse.net>; Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:49:03 -0400; Corbin's book on Q steam doesn't shed any light on this and I can't tell by looking at photos if the numbers/letters are white, aluminum or dulux so go with what you think is best and wait for some r; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-10/msg00147.html (14,760 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]