Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Distances\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Distances (score: 1)
Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:05:31 -0500
Distances "Rupert & Maureen" gamlenz Sun Mar 24, 2013 7:17 pm (PDT) . Posted by: Rupert, John Mitchell's response is correct from a railroad standpoint. Here in the U.S. a lot of our Interstate highw
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-03/msg00192.html (15,163 bytes)

2. [CBQ] Re: Distances (score: 1)
Author: "Winton" <wyhog@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:55:01 -0600
I think you mean nearest hundredth of a MILE, John. 1/10th mile is 528 ft and 1/100th of a mile is 52.8 ft so these MP locations are 0 to 52 ft from the actual location. Where I worked (Sheridan) it
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-03/msg00193.html (11,060 bytes)

3. [CBQ] Re: Distances (score: 1)
Author: "Winton" <wyhog@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:55:01 -0600
It is not all that hard to do. Just measure the distance from the milepost using multiple measurements of a long tape or standard surveying chains. Railroad Civil engineers measured accurate distanc
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-03/msg00194.html (11,958 bytes)

4. Re: [CBQ] Re: Distances (score: 1)
Author: archie hayden <klinerarch@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:18:52 -0500
AK, I did the very same thing as a member of the Quality team when we were making the same kind of guides for our division. Even with the side guides, I derailed quite a bit account rough track, ha.
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-03/msg00195.html (13,385 bytes)

5. RE: [CBQ] Re: Distances (score: 1)
Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:41:27 +1300
John , AK , Archie, and others Thanks for the responses. My father was an insurance surveyor early in his career and retained his measuring chain, but that was long before the measuring wheel with a
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-03/msg00196.html (14,515 bytes)

6. RE: [CBQ] Re: Distances (score: 1)
Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:41:59 +1300
Bill The railway magazines towards the end of the 19th century often raised the issue of metrification, but it was always regarded with suspicion, not withstanding the fact that many of the writers h
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-03/msg00197.html (15,119 bytes)

7. Re: [CBQ] Re: Distances (score: 1)
Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
__._,_.___ Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use Unsubscr
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-03/msg00205.html (12,374 bytes)

8. Re: [CBQ] Re: Distances (score: 1)
Author: STEVEN HOLDING <sholding@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
It was getting late. I did in deed mean hunredth of a mile! -- On Mon, 3/25/13, Winton <wyhog@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Winton <wyhog@yahoo.com> Subject: [CBQ] Re: Distances To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Da
/archives/BRHSLIST/2013-03/msg00208.html (14,036 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu