Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Commuter\s+push\-pull\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Commuter\s+push\-pull\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Commuter push-pull (score: 1): Author: William Barber <clipperw@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 10:24:06 -0600; Re: Commuter push-pull "dhartman@mchsi.com" douglas_p_hartman Thu Nov 8, 2012 1:52 pm (PST) . Posted by: No, E units, among other units, were being painted BN green at Clyde Diesel Shop when I was as; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00058.html (14,879 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Re: Commuter push-pull (score: 1): Author: "rgs20460" <amtrak347@aol.com>; Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:55:01 -0600; No, there were E7, E8 and E9 type locos painted silver. All 16 of the "Q" E9s received M-K "butchering/downgrading" in 1973 when BN paint was applied (BN 9910-9925). Late 1973 thru Dec. 1974, 5 "Q" E; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00065.html (12,461 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Re: Commuter push-pull (score: 1): Author: dhartman@mchsi.com; Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:45:23 +0000; No, there were E7, E8 and E9 type locos painted silver. All 16 of the "Q" E9s received M-K "butchering/downgrading" in 1973 when BN paint was applied (BN 9910-9925). Late 1973 thru Dec. 1974, 5 "Q"; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00067.html (14,827 bytes)
4. [CBQ] Re: Commuter push-pull (score: 1): Author: Karl Rethwisch <qrailroadman@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:05:17 -0800 (PST); Gee Bob, I thought you'd have more commentary on the GREAT M-K rebuilds. Aside from the fact that they NEVER performed like the E's of old, half the cab insulation had been omitted AND the brake valv; /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-11/msg00072.html (12,638 bytes)
5. [CBQ] Re: Commuter push-pull (score: 1): Author: "mactach@sbcglobal.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 21 Apr 2016 16:54:21 -0700; I know this thread is 4 years old but how come the Burlington which was ahead of the other RRD's in their modernization of their commuter lines have push-pull service till later on? C&NW and MD had t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-04/msg00145.html (13,292 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Re: Commuter push-pull (score: 1): Author: "Bill Hirt whirt@fastmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:29:25 -0500; At the spring meet two years ago, there was an excellent presentation on suburban service in the later years of the Burlington. I still appreciate the presenters passion in their presentation for run; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-04/msg00146.html (14,927 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Re: Commuter push-pull (score: 1): Author: "qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:32:23 -0500; I know this thread is 4 years old but how come the Burlington which was ahead of the other RRD's in their modernization of their commuter lines have push-pull service till later on? C&NW and MD had; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-04/msg00147.html (13,911 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Re: Commuter push-pull (score: 1): Author: "STEVEN HOLDING sholding@sbcglobal.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 02:28:28 +0000 (UTC); At the spring meet two years ago, there was an excellent presentation on suburban service in the later years of the Burlington. I still appreciate the presenters passion in their presentation for ru; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-04/msg00149.html (16,337 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]