Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Close\s+call\s+3\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+Close\s+call\s+3\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: Close call 3 (score: 1): Author: <mdecker@gwtc.net>; Date: 28 Apr 2014 08:36:14 -0700; But I'll bet there was a 25 mile/time or miles arbitrary for "hill doubling account excess tonnage" there :>) There used to be a lot of money in doubling your trains out of a mine after you'd ripped; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-04/msg00204.html (9,756 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Re: Close call 3 (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:32:26 -0400 (EDT); Seems like in the corners of my memory there was a provision that if you picked up at the last station it was worth 100 miles if you doubled and something less if you hadn't picked up??? Since we are; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-04/msg00205.html (10,815 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Re: Close call 3 (score: 1): Author: ralph linroth <wcman8@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:53:22 -0700 (PDT); Pete, that is correct and is from the April 13, 1949 lapback agreement. Under the sub article 'Doubling hills account Excess tonnage" , Paragraph 2 payment of 100 miles is due when "a crew is requir; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-04/msg00209.html (12,155 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Re: Close call 3 (score: 1): Author: Leo <qutlx1@aol.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:07:58 -0500; Pete and Bud are correct. However as a matter of working application (at least on the Aurora Div) not only did you have to p/u tonnage at the station,immediately prior to the double, the tonnage of y; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-04/msg00214.html (13,592 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]