- 1. [CBQ] Re: C&S Trains #29 and #30 (score: 1)
- Author: "william" <macon249@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 21:55:02 -0600
- Bob great post. I read with a lot of interest. I used to inspect the track up through Chugwater in the early 80's. In addition I would also say, if a piece of flange was found, the track was backtrac
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00153.html (16,121 bytes)
- 2. [CBQ] Re: C&S Trains #29 and #30 (score: 1)
- Author: "Jonathan Harris" <jonathanharris@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:55:01 -0600
- Wonder whether poor Stone got his chops up, or the company gave him the sack. -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email setti
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00163.html (13,021 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Re: C&S Trains #29 and #30 (score: 1)
- Author: Robert munshower <bearmtnbob@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 16:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
- Sounds as if he might have been a real "clinker." From: Jonathan Harris <jonathanharris@earthlink.net> To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 7:51 PM Subject: [CBQ] Re: C&S Trains #2
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-08/msg00164.html (15,269 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu