Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+BNSF\'s\s+CB\&Q\s+Heritage\s+loco\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+BNSF\'s\s+CB\&Q\s+Heritage\s+loco\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: Randy Gordon-Gilmore <zephyr9900@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:47:38 -0700; Thanks for the smile, lyon. You actually had me going for a minute or so. What's the G for? Randy -- Randy Gordon-Gilmore ,--.___________ ______________ _________________ ProtoTrains // =; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00008.html (11,792 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 22:31:00 -0500; The "G" is kind of a running joke on another group (RailSpot) that started with a typo. Thank you kindly, Michael Matalis mmatalis@sprynet.com See my photos and my ugly mug at: http://www.flickr.com/; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00011.html (12,416 bytes)
3. [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: Robert Myers <rmyers7@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:10:48 -0500; 'lyon_wonder' huh? Will the perp please take a bow. I don't care if it's a fake, it's gorgeous. It almost makes me want to run out and buy a modern locomotive. Bob -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00015.html (11,417 bytes)
4. [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: "Tom Mack" <thommack@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:09:02 -0600; OK, guys, as much as I am a fan of the Redbird scheme over the Blackbird scheme I must admit this is a pretty awesome looking unit! Of course, if the "Paintshop Guru" would like to show us one in Chi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00017.html (11,431 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: Cy Svobodny <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 08:38:09 -0700 (PDT); I would also like to see a Redbird. Hope somebody at BNSF is looking and maybe will copy Uncle Pete with heritage unots for all the premerged roads(GN, NP, SF(both), Frisco, etc). ..........CY OK,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00018.html (12,055 bytes)
6. [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: "bigbearoak" <jonathanharris@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:11:07 -0600; Yes ... I can see it now, ... a lash-up of BNSF SD70MACs emerging from a tunnel hauling a 100-car train. The engineer proudly waves from the lead unit, which is resplendent in its freshly painted her; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00020.html (13,434 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: Tim Fleck <tf5077@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:29:32 -0700 (PDT); I know several people that work for BNSF They inform me it will never happen because of ATSF Management now running BNSF. OK, guys, as much as I am a fan of the Redbird scheme over the Blackbird sche; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00023.html (12,115 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <normansen@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 17:54:59 -0500; Do you work for the BNSF? I have yet to see any "ATSF Management". What office do they work for? At who's building? Let's at least act like adults. You can also add this statement: What Railroad aske; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00025.html (13,664 bytes)
9. [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: "lyon_wonder" <lyon_wonder@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 01:32:53 -0600; The Peoria and Oquawka was a predecessor of the TP&W. ATSF acquired the TP&W in the late 1970s, only to be sold off again as an independent railroad in the 1989. Since ATSF divested itself of TP&W's; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00026.html (14,361 bytes)
10. [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Martin <kmartin537@surewest.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:46:59 -0700; The Peoria and Oquawka was originally authorized to build from Peoria to Oquawka, that was changed in 1852 to from Peoria to a point opposite from Burlington. It was also authorized to extend said ro; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00027.html (13,884 bytes)
11. Re: [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: "Rob & Bev Manley" <robev1630@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:11:44 -0500; Hey Kids, Remember when railfanning in Oquawka be sure to see the "Norma Jean Memnorial" It's worth the trip. Also the town diner has some great eats at a good price, not to mention the fish fry on F; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00028.html (14,494 bytes)
12. Re: [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: "Archie" <kliner@mywdo.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:37:29 -0500; Am I mistaken or what? I thought the P&O was the early railroad that built the segment between Burlington and Galesburg which the CB&Q finally acquired in 1862 after lengthy court battles. Archie --; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00030.html (14,471 bytes)
13. Re: [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: Stephen Levine <sjl_prodigynet@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:55:59 -0700 (PDT); Before its combination with the Chicago & Aurora, Central Military Tract, and Northern Cross railroads to form the Chicago Burlington and Quincy, I believe the P&O changed its name to the Peoria and; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00031.html (15,498 bytes)
14. [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: "bigbearoak" <jonathanharris@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:35:12 -0600; As long as we're in the realm of fantasy football here, the most delicious irony would be to do one up in some imaginary UPD&G scheme. For those who don't know, that's "Union Pacific Denver and Gulf,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00042.html (14,025 bytes)
15. Re: [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <normansen@groundcontrol.us>; Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 09:47:50 -0500; What does "Get'em good & mad" mean? Who is supposed to be mad and why? Can't you stick with real Trackage on real Railroads. As long as we're in the realm of fantasy football here, the most delicious; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00043.html (14,338 bytes)
16. Re: [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: dlgrobe@ameritech.net; Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:59:16 +0000; I think he was joking. The whole thread has been in the fantasy realm. No harm no foul. Dan Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T What does "Get'em good & mad" mean? Who is supposed to be mad and why? Can't yo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00044.html (15,352 bytes)
17. [CBQ] Re: BNSF's CB&Q Heritage loco (score: 1): Author: wohrnell@sbcglobal.net; Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 05:32:52 -0700 (PDT); Ken M, It appears you have the book Burlington Route by Richard C. Overton. Lenny Ohrnell -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-04/msg00048.html (10,946 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]