Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+1958\s+Wreck\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Re\:\s+1958\s+Wreck\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Re: 1958 Wreck (score: 1): Author: "bigbearoak" <jonathanharris@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:17:29 -0600; Those have to be some of the most horrifying pictures of a modern train wreck I've seen. They're much worse than the ones in Grenard's "Colorado and Southern, a Personal Memory of the Standard Gauge"; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00012.html (14,219 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Re: 1958 Wreck (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <borneo@19main.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:20:41 -0600; That make no sense. You blame the Engineer. Why? Are you telling me that 5 miles from Semper the other crews were not reading? Why not? The are as just as responsible as the entire members of the cre; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00013.html (14,856 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Re: 1958 Wreck (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:56:06 -0500; Have you guys gone to the ICC website and read the details???? If you haven't you need to do so... Something which I refer to as the "intimidation factor" was involved here...If you want me to I'll; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00014.html (15,810 bytes)
4. [CBQ] Re: 1958 Wreck (score: 1): Author: richard haave <therrboomer@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:04:42 -0800 (PST); There was another event which prolonged steam on C&S. Another head on at Chugwater on 9/16/58 between X828 South and X750A North which injured five people on X750A N. Engs 750A,750B were destroyed; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00015.html (9,457 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Re: 1958 Wreck (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:08:07 -0500; Both affairs are listed right next to each other on the ICC website...You can read the details of both. BTW someone referred to the "Goin Railroadin" book and the 'Speas boys as engineers.... If any; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00016.html (10,483 bytes)
6. [CBQ] Re: 1958 Wreck (score: 1): Author: "bigbearoak" <jonathanharris@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:39:32 -0600; Russ - I meant no disrespect to any person involved. I was simply paraphrasing the account given by Speas, who was senior engineer on the C&S, familiar with the incident, and a friend of all three me; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00017.html (17,460 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Re: 1958 Wreck (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <borneo@19main.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:49:47 -0600; Pete, I read it. So what? Rules are rules. The other members of the crew allowed them to be "intimidation factor". That is stupid. "Emergency" mean just that. If they are still not able to understand; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00018.html (17,339 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Re: 1958 Wreck (score: 1): Author: "Russ Strodtz" <borneo@19main.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:51:09 -0600; Read it: http://dotlibrary1.specialcollection.net/scripts/ws.dll?websearch&site=dot_railroads Russ - I meant no disrespect to any person involved. I was simply paraphrasing the account given by Speas; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00019.html (17,909 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Re: 1958 Wreck (score: 1): Author: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com; Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:34:57 -0500; Here's the link to the ICC website...http://dotlibrary.specialcollection.net/ Click on the Rairoad Accident investigations 1911-1994....This will bring up the individual years....Click on 1958...Ther; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-02/msg00026.html (18,077 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]