Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Question\s+on\s+bi\-level\s+commuter\s+trucks\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Question\s+on\s+bi\-level\s+commuter\s+trucks\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Question on bi-level commuter trucks (score: 1): Author: "Scott Stearns" <scott_b_stearns@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:33:24 +0000; Good morning, I was looking through the latest Walthers flyer and noticed that they have a sale going on for both passenger and freight trucks. We have several non-brass bi-levels that we want to rep; /archives/BRHSLIST/2019-01/msg00182.html (11,292 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Question on bi-level commuter trucks (score: 1): Author: "Bryan Howell via Groups.Io" <tubaman21=yahoo.com@groups.io>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 16:49:01 +0000 (UTC); The trucks used on the bi-levels were 41-NV-11 trucks, I believe. The closest ones Walthers has is a 41-N-11, but they are on backorder. https://www.walthers.com/gsc-41-n-11-passenger-trucks-w-clasp-; /archives/BRHSLIST/2019-01/msg00183.html (12,766 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Question on bi-level commuter trucks (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:34:25 -0600; Were the CB&Q gallery car trucks a little lower profile than normal 41-Nxxx trucks? I seem to remember this being the case (at least for the C&NW bilevels) but dont have any documentation. Which brin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2019-01/msg00184.html (11,091 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Question on bi-level commuter trucks (score: 1): Author: "zephyr98072" <glenehaug@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:46:45 +0000; Charlie: I don't know if they were considered low profile, but the trucks on the gallery cars had 33" wheels, so the top of the casting could have been 1-1/2" lower that trucks with 36" wheels. I hav; /archives/BRHSLIST/2019-01/msg00186.html (14,188 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]