BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Question on bi-level commuter trucks

To: <CBQ@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Question on bi-level commuter trucks
From: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:34:25 -0600
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@groups.io
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; q=dns/txt; s=20140610; t=1548876871; bh=ryOp44lVvwHGTrVpCD74Dd7zjjvCWAWcyuQNwkNqBx0=; h=Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To; b=Tug6THJgZ18qv/ZLGWF3aN3szTItDfIPsbSyOk1Aje+6pxepY6LVhJfWuP6e9dRyhLO VSDXNpWDsY/s4m4qn19N/4IF9ZytHW+0CtieDzdx1gzO8yKM55apwBEfj1nX89gr6T2or LAdUsOgDb3yb4aERn4k3lFQSBigNt2n3t3Y=
In-reply-to: <2076050352.273684.1548866941533@mail.yahoo.com>
List-id: <CBQ.groups.io>
List-unsubscribe: <https://groups.io/g/CBQ/unsub>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io
References: <DM6PR06MB538852E9394586CA445D423EBE900@DM6PR06MB5388.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <2076050352.273684.1548866941533@mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@groups.io
Sender: CBQ@groups.io
Thread-index: AQHpbr/nTy5RLUz+e11F56/UdzozSgKpjIs5pYl6cCA=

Were the CB&Q gallery car trucks a little lower profile than “normal” 41-Nxxx trucks?

I seem to remember this being the case (at least for the C&NW bilevels) but don’t have any documentation.

Which brings up a related subject….does anyone have a CB&Q Truck Diagram Book that has passenger car trucks newer than the 9903?   Or did the Q just rely on manufacturers manuals, etc. and not create their own drawings?

Charlie Vlk

 

_._,_._,_

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#56669) | Reply To Group | Mute This Topic | New Topic

Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>