Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Preservation\s+of\s+Q\s+Diesels\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Preservation\s+of\s+Q\s+Diesels\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Preservation of Q Diesels (score: 1): Author: "Tom Mack" <thommack@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:44:04 -0600; It recently came to my attention there are three ex-CB&Q U28B's left, all at TTI in Kentucky. Only 1 U28B has been preserved, and ex-L&N unit that is currently at the Kentucky Railroad Museum. To my; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-08/msg00049.html (10,800 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Preservation of Q Diesels (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <rgz17@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:58:42 -0500; Phil will likely provide the specifics, but for the IRM, you not only purchase the loco, get it there (i.e. pay for transport), then you have $x per running foot of the locomotive. The Western Class; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-08/msg00050.html (12,715 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Preservation of Q Diesels (score: 1): Author: "Phil" <pstepek@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:31:45 -0500; current museum cost is about $75 per foot of track for any piece of equipment That is over and above the cost of movement, which right now is a serious issue. If a piece was to be accepted by the mus; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-08/msg00051.html (13,419 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Preservation of Q Diesels (score: 1): Author: cy svobodny <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:58:59 -0700 (PDT); Just because a museum gets a "Q" unit does not mean they will preserve it as "Q". Recently the MTM received a SD-7 or 9 from the BNSF. It was originally as C&S. The MTM repainted in BN green & black; /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-08/msg00052.html (9,522 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]