- 1. [CBQ] I.I.&I.Jct ? (score: 1)
- Author: "qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:54:26 -0600
- There are some 1905 Q train orders on eBay,and I have similar ones in my collection that Order a crew to move extra from I.I.&I. Jct to other points on the Aurora Div. line from Streator to Walnut. S
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-11/msg00047.html (10,767 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] I.I.&I.Jct ? (score: 1)
- Author: "qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 08:05:04 -0600
- Leo, A quic search found: I. I. & I. + Indiana, Illinois and Iowa Railroad (page does not exist) Indiana, Illinois and Iowa Consolidated into the C.I.& S. in 1906. In 1914 consolidated into the NYC.
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-11/msg00050.html (15,044 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] I.I.&I.Jct ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:00:46 +0000
- Leo and Group: I had been looking at those orders, and once again, two of them refer to engine numbers that are definitely not CB&Q locomotive numbers. Since the II&I already had close ties to the NY
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-11/msg00051.html (17,436 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] I.I.&I.Jct ? (score: 1)
- Author: "qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:53:08 -0600
- Leo and Group: I had been looking at those orders, and once again, two of them refer to engine numbers that are definitely not CB&Q locomotive numbers. Since the II&I already had close ties to the N
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-11/msg00054.html (17,444 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CBQ] I.I.&I.Jct ? (score: 1)
- Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:39:08 +0000
- Leo: I've seen a number of train orders from the period in late 1898-early 1899 when Union Pacific, Denver & Gulf locomotives were being renumbered to their new C&S numbers, and no reporting marks ar
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-11/msg00055.html (20,125 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu