- 1. [CBQ] FT Photo (score: 1)
- Author: "HOL WAGNER" <holpennywagner@msn.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:51:52 +0000
- I just purchased this photo on eBay. At first glance it is not a particularly interesting or high quality view, showing FT 102 on an extra freight -- all reefers, at least up front -- said to be some
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00088.html (16,430 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CBQ] FT Photo (score: 1)
- Author: "popbumper1" <popbumper1@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:19:25 -0600
- Thanks for sharing Hol, very interesting and unique! Chris Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -- Original message -- From: HOL WAGNER <holpennywagner@msn.com> Date: 2/11/21 3:52 PM (GMT-
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00089.html (15,035 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] FT Photo (score: 1)
- Author: "Jason Johnson" <alexmarissa@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:35:45 -0600
- I just purchased this photo on eBay. At first glance it is not a particularly interesting or high quality view, showing FT 102 on an extra freight -- all reefers, at least up front -- said to be som
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00090.html (15,118 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] FT Photo (score: 1)
- Author: "Leo Phillipp via groups.io" <qutlx1=aol.com@groups.io>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:29:07 -0600
- Hol, I cant identify the location but do note the hill side seems to be freshly disturbed or distributed earth and I note what appear to streaks of slag dust on the rail web. Looks like a recently bu
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00091.html (15,691 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CBQ] FT Photo (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Pavlovic" <cbq168a@comcast.net>
- Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:13:59 -0600
- Leo, You think it might possibly be somewhere on the C&I? There were a number of line relocations done on that line which might be the reason for the disturbed hillside. Which reminds me of a convers
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00117.html (10,939 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CBQ] FT Photo (score: 1)
- Author: "Leo Phillipp via groups.io" <qutlx1=aol.com@groups.io>
- Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:07:29 -0600
- Ed, Might be. My understanding is the majority of line relocations were done post 1901 at Mr. Hills request for a better engineered RR. Though I think Ive read that there was considerable super eleva
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00121.html (11,489 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CBQ] FT Photo (score: 1)
- Author: "Louis Zadnichek via groups.io" <LZadnichek=aol.com@groups.io>
- Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 22:44:58 +0000 (UTC)
- February 13, 2021 Hol - From the BRHS Flickr Gallery, I've attached images of FT sets 101 and 103 before they were broken-up as you describe. FT set 101 is shown at Downers Grove, IL, and is undated.
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00125.html (16,350 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CBQ] FT Photo (score: 1)
- Author: "akskron" <Akskron@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 17:18:30 -0600
- _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#61428) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group O
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-02/msg00127.html (12,663 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu