Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+EX\s+C\&NW\s+Smooth\s+side\s+coaches\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+EX\s+C\&NW\s+Smooth\s+side\s+coaches\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] EX C&NW Smooth side coaches (score: 1): Author: "baton580" <rplaehn@cox-internet.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:35:31 -0600; IIRC the Burlington purchased several ex C&NW smoothside streamline coaches. I'm curious as to why these were purchased considering that passenger service was already shrinking and extra passenger eq; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-11/msg00041.html (8,900 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] EX C&NW Smooth side coaches (score: 1): Author: cvlk@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:53:14 +0000; AFAIK no Budd passenger cars were sidelined prior to AMTRAK. My guess is that the Q (and GN and NP) saw an opportunity to pick up some equipment in good shape to replace aging heavyweight cars that w; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-11/msg00042.html (9,879 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] EX C&NW Smooth side coaches (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@aol.com; Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:22:26 EST; In a message dated 11/10/2004 8:57:47 AM Central Standard Time, cvlk@comcast.net writes: the Burlington might have had more Budd equipment as a percentage of their fleet than anybody else, but there; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-11/msg00043.html (8,803 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]