Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Dynamic\s+Brakes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Dynamic\s+Brakes\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] Dynamic Brakes (score: 1): Author: "neanderguy2002" <neanderman@fuse.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2020 03:29:20 -0500; _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#59051) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@na; /archives/BRHSLIST/2020-03/msg00000.html (10,898 bytes)
2. [CBQ] Dynamic Brakes (score: 1): Author: "John Olson" <trains28@jimsjunction.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:41:25 -0700; I have a question. Since all of the Q's freight F-units (including FT's) were delivered with Dynamic Brakes and none of the GP-7's or GP-9's were- when the 'Q' spliced one or more of these GP's i; /archives/BRHSLIST/2020-02/msg00207.html (9,964 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Dynamic Brakes (score: 1): Author: "Tom Mack via Groups.Io" <thommack=yahoo.com@groups.io>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 13:56:22 -0800; _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#59040) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nau; /archives/BRHSLIST/2020-02/msg00219.html (11,395 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Dynamic Brakes (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Sheffield" <yardmaster1@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:12:55 -0800; John, My understanding is that only a locomotive equipped with dynamic brakes can activate them, therefore, the GP's would not be able to control the dynamic brakes on a locomotive so equipped. Jerry; /archives/BRHSLIST/2020-02/msg00221.html (11,658 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Dynamic Brakes (score: 1): Author: "jim cunningham" <jimc1182@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:34:17 -0700; _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#59045) | Reply To Group Mute This Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nau; /archives/BRHSLIST/2020-02/msg00224.html (13,726 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Dynamic Brakes (score: 1): Author: "jim cunningham" <jimc1182@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:37:59 -0700; The Fs and early GPs had to have a field loop cable to excite the DB and without it they would not work, much later they were modified to take the signal off the 27 pin MU cables but by then most Fs; /archives/BRHSLIST/2020-02/msg00225.html (12,798 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Dynamic Brakes (score: 1): Author: "John Olson" <trains28@jimsjunction.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:42:05 -0700; Tom, I figured that this would be the case, but I was not absolutely sure, and wondered if a DB signal might send a non-DB unit into a tizzy trying to figure out what was going on! John Olson Bi; /archives/BRHSLIST/2020-02/msg00226.html (12,555 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Dynamic Brakes (score: 1): Author: "John Olson" <trains28@jimsjunction.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 09:49:45 -0700; Thanks Jerry, I was pretty sure that a non-DB unit would not be able to activate the DB's on other units since it would not be equipped with the proper controls. I was more interested in non-DB un; /archives/BRHSLIST/2020-02/msg00227.html (13,349 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]