Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Confusing\s+Train\s+Order\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Confusing\s+Train\s+Order\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CBQ] Confusing Train Order (score: 1): Author: "'John Trulson' norskeviking@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:46:50 -0700; Comparing the 3 and the 8, the unknown number more closely resembles the number 5 than the way the other two numbers are written. As you mention though, what and why would an oil burner assigned to S; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-09/msg00007.html (14,957 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Confusing Train Order (score: 1): Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:21:26 -0400; September 7, 2016 Hol - My first thought was may be the locomotive was Class B-1 No. 7018 built in 1925, but the more I look at the handwriting I think the first number is a "5." That would lead us b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-09/msg00066.html (15,267 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Confusing Train Order (score: 1): Author: "'John D. Mitchell, Jr.' cbqrr47@yahoo.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 02:46:15 +0000 (UTC); September 7, 2016 Hol - My first thought was may be the locomotive was Class B-1 No. 7018 built in 1925, but the more I look at the handwriting I think the first number is a "5." That would lead us; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-09/msg00068.html (18,364 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Confusing Train Order (score: 1): Author: "LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 10:48:24 -0400; September 8, 2016 John - Excellent point. That's a good possibility, too. Best Regards - Louis In a message dated 9/7/2016 9:46:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time, CBQ@yahoogroups.com writes: I have one s; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-09/msg00080.html (18,565 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Confusing Train Order (score: 1): Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:58:46 +0000; John: A good explanation indeed. The more I look at the number on the train order, the more it looks like a 5 more than any other number, and certainly not like the other 3s in the same order. So it; /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-09/msg00084.html (20,671 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]