- 1. [CBQ] Close call 1 (score: 1)
- Author: Leo <qutlx1@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:09:13 -0500
- The list is fairly quiet so in the interest of generating conversation and explaining how "it used to be" here's a close call I was a part of: we were coming down Sugar Grove hill eastbound into Auro
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-04/msg00153.html (12,066 bytes)
- 2. RE: [CBQ] Close call 1 (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:17:17 -0400
- Leo, Interesting account, and most fortunate indeed! In the third paragraph you mention a shifted load for the first time. Did the load shift due to the derailment? Where in the train was the shifted
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-04/msg00160.html (12,239 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] Close call 1 (score: 1)
- Author: Cy Svobodny <ctsvobodny@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
- These make for good reading, even for a railroader. On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 11:16 PM, Dave Lotz <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net> wrote: Leo, Interesting account, and most fortunate indeed! In the
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-04/msg00161.html (13,034 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] Close call 1 (score: 1)
- Author: Leo <qutlx1@aol.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 07:41:18 -0500
- Dave, Glad you asked as I got in RR mode telling the story. The 1x14x16 ( I know the size of the board keeps changing,it was wide,thin and long. Sailed like a kite) that went airborne came off the sh
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-04/msg00162.html (14,052 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CBQ] Close call 1 (score: 1)
- Author: dhartman@mchsi.com
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:41:37 +0000
- Leo, great story. The point about an elevation derailment and the horror that could have caused.... Interesting point with the detector - given the "cost/benefit" arguments of reduced crews. Not to h
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-04/msg00164.html (13,208 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu