Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+C\&S\s+600\s+series\s+2\-8\-0\s+from\s+Bachmann\s+2\-8\-0\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+C\&S\s+600\s+series\s+2\-8\-0\s+from\s+Bachmann\s+2\-8\-0\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] C&S 600 series 2-8-0 from Bachmann 2-8-0? (score: 1): Author: richtownsend@netscape.net; Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 19:11:05 -0500; I want to have some C&S 600 series 2-8-0s for my C&S layout. I am looking at the Bachmann Spectrum 2-8-0 as a possible starting point. Has anyone considered such a project? Are the drive and boiler d; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00060.html (9,571 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] C&S 600 series 2-8-0 from Bachmann 2-8-0? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Yarger" <ryarger@rypn.org>; Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:22:04 -0500; Bachmann drivers are too big, about 60" vs. 57". An old PFM Santa Fe 1951 class 2-8-0 is probably a better starting point. Note the B4R class (built by Alco predecessors) have 15-spoke drivers, but t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00067.html (10,888 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] C&S 600 series 2-8-0 from Bachmann 2-8-0? (score: 1): Author: railbass@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:31:29 +0000; Rich - I have looked at kitbashing a C&S 600 from the Spectrum model, and the basic dimensions are fairly close, except for the C&S tender, which is shorter. The cab needs some modification, stack, d; /archives/BRHSLIST/2006-02/msg00082.html (10,963 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]