Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Builder\s+in\s+56\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Builder\s+in\s+56\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Builder in 56 (score: 1): Author: "little-q@att.net" <trains@davidstreeter.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 18:38:46 -0500; In the summer of 1956, how many Es would the Q have put on the Empire Builder? Would they have been all facing forward? -- David Streeter -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all mess; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00131.html (9,867 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Builder in 56 (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Egan" <padraice38@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 07:49:45 -0500; I believe in the late spring of 55, it was 3, most likely 1 forward. Virus-free. www.avast.com _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#61714) |; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00132.html (11,111 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Builder in 56 (score: 1): Author: "little-q@att.net" <trains@davidstreeter.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 13:25:07 -0500; I was afraid of that. Means I need to find another BLI E with black stripes. -- David Streeter On 3/21/2021 7:49 AM, Patrick Egan wrote: I believe in the late spring of 55, it was 3, most likely 1 fo; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00136.html (12,342 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Builder in 56 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Mack via groups.io" <thommack=yahoo.com@groups.io>; Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 18:22:45 -0700; _._,_._,_ Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#61721) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic Your Subscription | Contact Group O; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00139.html (11,428 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Builder in 56 (score: 1): Author: "little-q@att.net" <trains@davidstreeter.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 04:24:39 -0500; Thanks. I'll keep that in mind if I decide to the train in the late 60s, but right now my interest is the mid to late 50s. -- David Streeter On 3/21/2021 8:22 PM, Tom Mack via groups.io wrote: On Sat; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00141.html (12,371 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Builder in 56 (score: 1): Author: "William Barber" <clipperw@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:15:30 -0500; Dave, The Q didnt start adding MU to the front of their E units until the mid to late 1950s per the BRHS E Unit Bulletin No. 10 and didnt finish the work until the early 1960s. Having spent a lot of; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00146.html (11,500 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] Builder in 56 (score: 1): Author: "little-q@att.net" <trains@davidstreeter.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:28:16 -0500; I will keep that in mind. -- David Streeter The Q didnt start adding MU to the front of their E units until the mid to late 1950s per the BRHS E Unit Bulletin No. 10 and didnt finish the work until t; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00153.html (11,817 bytes)
8. Re: [CBQ] Builder in 56 (score: 1): Author: "Richard Gortowski via groups.io" <rgortowski=aol.com@groups.io>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 23:09:46 +0000 (UTC); If you are really feeling ambitious, you can splice an EA (with the "beauty" treatment) or an EA-B unit between two E units. Per Mike Spoor's CB&Q in Color Vol 1: "After the arrival of the E-7s and E; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00160.html (12,773 bytes)
9. Re: [CBQ] Builder in 56 (score: 1): Author: "little-q@att.net" <trains@davidstreeter.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:27:37 -0500; I acquired the train from the estate of a deceased friend. The box is labeled "Empire Builder summer 1956" or something to that effect. I suppose I should do some research on it anyway, but that's th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2021-03/msg00162.html (13,698 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]