Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Budd\s+Sleepers\s+on\s+the\s+Q\s+$\s+was\s+Re\:\s+A\s+Plethora\s+of\s+Pullmans$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Budd\s+Sleepers\s+on\s+the\s+Q\s+$\s+was\s+Re\:\s+A\s+Plethora\s+of\s+Pullmans$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Budd Sleepers on the Q ( was Re: A Plethora of Pullmans) (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J. Levine" <sjl@prodigy.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:23:53 -0600; Charlie By the time the CZ sleepers were built, the Pullman suit was resolved and the operating arm of that company was being sold to the railroads. Remember that the streamlined post-war Pullmans al; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-02/msg00190.html (11,741 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Budd Sleepers on the Q ( was Re: A Plethora of Pullmans) (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:44:53 -0600; StephenI don't disagree with your statements... but it came to me that the Q didn't have (???) Budd Sleepers for "Pool" service...they were purpose built for the 1949 (CZ) 1952 (CZ,ARZ,KCZ) and 1956; /archives/BRHSLIST/2004-02/msg00192.html (10,548 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]