Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Back\s+Porch\s+On\s+O\-1\-A\s+Tender\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+Back\s+Porch\s+On\s+O\-1\-A\s+Tender\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] Back Porch On O-1-A Tender (score: 1): Author: "czeiler@centurytel.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 08 Dec 2015 17:31:07 -0800; A builders photo of 2-8-2 Class O-1-A 4994 shows an extended frame on the tender resulting in a back porch. What was the purpose of the porch? See the photo at the address below. CB&Q 2-8-2 Class O-1; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-12/msg00012.html (16,705 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] Back Porch On O-1-A Tender (score: 1): Author: "JK public@redtower.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:41:17 -0500; Hol, don't you mean that the underframes were *not* swapped out? Wasn't that the intention, to fit the new tank on the already-long-enough underframe? Or maybe I'm misunderstanding your comment...; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-12/msg00015.html (14,494 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] Back Porch On O-1-A Tender (score: 1): Author: "JK public@redtower.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:46:11 -0500; Nevermind...I got what you said now (I think). The underframes were swapped to the O-3s or M-2s with the new tanks. Were the O-1s then given the old O-3/M-2 tenders? Cheers! Jan On 12/9/2015 9:41 A; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-12/msg00016.html (15,438 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] Back Porch On O-1-A Tender (score: 1): Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:54:28 +0000; Jan: The new O-1-As received the tender underframes from the from the O-3s and M-2s/M-2-As that got their tenders lengthened and rode on the new underframes that Baldwin had delivered under the O-1-A; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-12/msg00017.html (17,900 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] Back Porch On O-1-A Tender (score: 1): Author: "czeiler@centurytel.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: 09 Dec 2015 08:50:00 -0800; Thanks Hol, as usual I would like to use your explanation in the comments to the photo so other folks will understand the back porch situation. __._,_.___ Posted by: czeiler@centurytel.net Visit Your; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-12/msg00018.html (12,748 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] Back Porch On O-1-A Tender (score: 1): Author: "Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 18:40:13 +0000; Chuck: Sure, go ahead. Hol From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of czeiler@centurytel.net [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 9:50 AM To: CBQ@yahoogroup; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-12/msg00019.html (15,109 bytes)
7. RE: [CBQ] Back Porch On O-1-A Tender (score: 1): Author: "'Charlie Vlk' cvlk@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:31:10 -0600; __._,_.___ Visit Your Group Yahoo! Groups • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use __,_._,___; /archives/BRHSLIST/2015-12/msg00020.html (19,610 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]