BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Back Porch On O-1-A Tender

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Back Porch On O-1-A Tender
From: "JK public@redtower.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:46:11 -0500
Authentication-results: mta1003.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=redtower.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=redtower.net; dkim=neutral (no sig)
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1449672389; bh=0TdymHep/7ClL+livZatqCIUV2m1MS9bjqKZ5FiJ5+M=; h=To:References:In-Reply-To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=kuJ32PM/Ptk4raVpV59nQZL9R8SjY4917bt7SXfGF8hzEZsbaouI/dl71BOuJI87c2pJDDt8WNImF+mdWillIMCIoYp2qK07Jdm3oRA4Xbd4pILWGRk0NB4RyDyIOxeuuHO7WIm1KBckkoyUKJZC3YQxZHzIITkQZPaJNB7ebDw=
In-reply-to: <56683D8D.50308@redtower.net>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <n4808r+53no4g@YahooGroups.com> <BY1PR14MB0024A0FF25A6B777EAACBD8CCAE80@BY1PR14MB0024.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <56683D8D.50308@redtower.net>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0


Nevermind...I got what you said now (I think).  The underframes were swapped to the O-3s or M-2s with the new tanks.  Were the O-1s then given the old O-3/M-2 tenders?

Cheers!

Jan

On 12/9/2015 9:41 AM, JK public@redtower.net [CBQ] wrote:
 

Hol, don't you mean that the underframes were *not* swapped out?  Wasn't that the intention, to fit the new tank on the already-long-enough underframe?  Or maybe I'm misunderstanding your comment...

Cheers!

Jan

On 12/9/2015 9:08 AM, Hol Wagner holpennywagner@msn.com [CBQ] wrote:
 

Chuck:


In 1923 the ever-frugal Q was planning to increase the water capacity of a number of its O-3 and M-2/M-2-A engines by lengthening their tenders, so it had Baldwin deliver new O-1-A Mikes 4940-4999 with tender underframes long enough to fit the lengthened tenders of the O-3s and M-2 engines.  The underframes were then swapped out as the lengthening was completed.  Which means most of the 4900s ran for at least a short time with the back porch tenders, and I'd love to find a photo showing that.  Charlie Vlk, didn't you once tell me you had found such a photo?  Attached is the builder's photo of 4942, confirming that it, like 4994, came from Baldwin with the long underframe tender.


Hol





__._,_.___

Posted by: JK <public@redtower.net>



__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>