Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Twins\,\s+was\s+Re\:\s+Challenger\s+Zephyrs\s+\&\s+05\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Twins\,\s+was\s+Re\:\s+Challenger\s+Zephyrs\s+\&\s+05\'s\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Twins, was Re: Challenger Zephyrs & 05's (score: 1): Author: "M. Thayer" <zephyr@k...>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 21:54:15 -0500; Cities few The 49' (40 seat) coach was #525, built 6/35; the 64' (60-seat) coach was the Pioneer Zephyr was built 6/38. The history of these cars is often confused. her consist until delivery of #500; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-04/msg00177.html (8,883 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Twins, was Re: Challenger Zephyrs & 05's (score: 1): Author: "M. Thayer" <zephyr@k...>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 20:11:55 -0500; <blush> - That wasn't what I meant . . . I am concerned if Challenger is marketing their 4-car 9901/9902 as Twin Zephyr assignments. It just didn't happen. (I did offer to advise them & got a "yeah y; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-04/msg00186.html (8,185 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Twins, was Re: Challenger Zephyrs & 05's (score: 1): Author: Randy Gordon-Gilmore <zephyrus@r...>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 22:05:45 -0700; I do see your point, Marshall. I'm just trying to think of the trains over their whole service life. When Dick Billings and I were working on the Fine N-Scale PZ, I brought up the point of 525 being; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-04/msg00199.html (9,630 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Twins, was Re: Challenger Zephyrs & 05's (score: 1): Author: CILTRAINS@a...; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 10:22:22 EDT; The following posting(s) have been appearing on this site. While usually endeavoring to avoid participation in controversy, we felt the necessity of response to the following. Our response follows th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-04/msg00203.html (7,512 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Twins, was Re: Challenger Zephyrs & 05's (score: 1): Author: "M. Thayer" <zephyr@k...>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:26:59 -0500; Well. I *do* seem to have opened a can of worms. citation. zephyr@k... marketing Yes - 525 was removed from 9900 for the Advance Denver Zephyr service . . . and Car 506 was removed from the 9903 (Bec; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-04/msg00205.html (9,747 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]