Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+SHOVEL\s+NOSE\s+DIESELS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+SHOVEL\s+NOSE\s+DIESELS\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] SHOVEL NOSE DIESELS (score: 1): Author: "Marshall Thayer" <zephyr9903@e...>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:16:40 -0700; hauled by a shovel nose diesel. I see that Railway Classics are doing a Pegasus or Zephyrus as modernised in 1940. Would this be suitable? <<< 9904 and 9905 had a rather limited life-span as non-ded; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-10/msg00254.html (8,515 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] SHOVEL NOSE DIESELS (score: 1): Author: Ken Martin <kmartin@c...>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:23:32 -0700; Awhile back there was a picture on ebay of 9904 or 9905 with a heavyweight Baggage-coach and coach running under a signal bridge on three track. I don't know where it was running. But there is proof; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-10/msg00255.html (7,359 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] SHOVEL NOSE DIESELS (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 04:27:25 EDT; I have seen pictures of Silver King and Queen running on the Expo FLyer. Now that wouldn't be all heavy weight cars. I plan to use King and Queen on my Expo Flyer if Branchline ever comes out with th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-10/msg00257.html (6,183 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] SHOVEL NOSE DIESELS (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@a...>; Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:24:26 -0500; The "Zephyr Boosters" seemed to be regularly assigned to the Empire Builder... sandwiched between a pair of E's... Anybody know why the 9906/7 boosters were not used, or where they were used??? They; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-10/msg00258.html (9,825 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]