Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Rule\s+G\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Rule\s+G\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Rule G (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@a...; Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 22:17:17 EST; Leo et al Speaking from a somewhat limited perspective it seems that it was pretty standard that a Rule G violation was automatic dismissal, but the protocol was that the guy would be put back after; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00330.html (7,691 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Rule G (score: 1): Author: Q5632west@a...; Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 22:53:05 EST; Leo: Wonder if he dropped by the C&I Tap? Would have been appropriate since the place seems to have been named for the Q predecessor. Anyone know the history of this particular watering hole? It was; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-12/msg00331.html (6,741 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]